Year: 2023

  • what is ev.io?

    Ev.io is one of the most popular games on the Solana Blockchain. Developed by Addictive Games, the shooter runs in any modern web browser and rewards players with e, an internal token exchangeable for SOL.

    The game has been heavily supported and sponsored by Fractal Launchpad, which is now the main marketplace to buy and sell ev.io NFTs.
    Players in ev.io can make money by playing the shooter and earning “e” tokens for killing their opponents and winning goals during the fight. The tokens can be exchanged at a flat and guaranteed rate of $5 per 10,000e.

    Ev.io is a “play to earn” game. Play to earn was not viable before the blockchain technology because it wasn’t practical to send money anywhere around the world to people anonymously without going through a lot of hassle (paypal, central banks, western union, etc). With blockchain technology however, sending cryptocurrency from the USA to an anonymous person India is easy and practical.

    In theory a play to earn game works the same way a credit card rewards program works. Credit card companies earn a small amount of money each time a card is used, and a portion of that money goes back to the user. Game developers/publishers earn a small amount of money for every minute a player spends in the game via advertising. A portion of the money earned goes back to the player as a reward. Just like in a credit card rewards program.

    In a video game like ev.io, every minute a player spends in the game is worth something to us in the form of advertising opportunities. Sponsors, who benefit from these advertising opportunities, put up money in a pot for players to earn. Players need to buy our NFTs in order to earn.

    • profit by selling NFTs which the players need to earn
    • Players profit by playing the game to earn from a p2e pot put up by sponsors
    • Sponsors profit in advertising opportunities

    The business model is very simple. You don’t need a degree in economics to understand it. More importantly, it is not a ponzi scheme, which is what the vast majority of crypto projects are. Most play to earn economies depend upon new players coming in to prop up the earning rewards i.e. the sale of NFT. Ev.io’s economy depends on sponsors.

    They are makers of games first and our entire philosophy revolves around putting gameplay first. Play now! https://ev.io/

    Their interview with Justin Kan (co-found of Twitch)

  • The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes – literally snakes!

    Let’s dive into the recent addition to “The Hunger Games” franchise, “The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes.” Don’t let the lengthy title scare you; we’re here to dissect the good, the bad, and the unexpected in this prequel adventure.

    A Peek Behind the Capital’s Curtain

    Set in the opulent heart of Panem’s capital, this movie offers a backstage pass to the intriguing world that was only hinted at in the original trilogy. Classism, political intrigue, and the birth of the Hunger Games as a form of entertainment take center stage. President Snow, played masterfully by Tom Hollander, becomes the focal point, showcasing the transformation of a seemingly ordinary person into the formidable figure we know.

    The mid-century futuristic sci-fi aesthetic of the capital is a visual treat. Analog technology, CRT televisions, and a blend of retro and futuristic styles create a unique atmosphere. It’s a refreshing departure from the sleek, digital landscapes we often associate with futuristic movies.


    The Game of Thrones Alum Shines Bright

    Tom Hollander, known for his role in “Game of Thrones,” steals the spotlight as President Snow. Despite knowing where his character’s journey leads, Hollander offers a nuanced portrayal, humanizing Snow and making us forget, if only momentarily, the tyrant he becomes. Viola Davis, playing a mad scientist of sorts, brings her A-game, injecting humor and fun into her character.

    Peter Dinklage, another “Game of Thrones” veteran, delivers a stellar performance, leaving us wondering what it would be like if Tyrion Lannister was the mastermind behind The Hunger Games.


    Low Budget Characters and Missed Opportunities

    Unfortunately, not every character shines as brightly. Rachel Ziggler, despite having a remarkable singing voice, falls into the shadows as Lucy Gray. The character lacks the depth and backstory that made Katniss Everdeen memorable. While the film hints at the manipulative tactics used in the Games, it misses the opportunity to explore the dystopian concepts of information control.


    Rushing to the Finish Line

    The film is divided into three chapters, with the final act falling short of the buildup. It feels rushed, cheapening the emotional payoff for both supporting characters and President Snow. The sprint to the end leaves viewers wanting more depth and connection to the characters.


    CGI Woes and the Bittersweet Conclusion

    As is becoming more common, CGI issues rear their heads. A noticeable green screen moment may distract some viewers. The conclusion, while having its emotional moments, feels somewhat forced and lacks the impact that a miniseries format might have allowed.

    A Party for Fans and Drinkers

    “The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes” is a mixed bag. Tom Hollander’s performance and the exploration of the capital’s past are highlights, but the rushed pacing, lackluster supporting characters, and CGI hiccups drag it down. If you’re a die-hard Hunger Games fan, or perhaps if you’re a bit tipsy, this might be your party. However, for others, it might not be the grand spectacle they were hoping for.

    In the end, “The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes” tantalizes with glimpses of the captivating world behind the Games but leaves us yearning for more substance and a more refined execution. May the odds be ever in your favor as you embark on this cinematic journey!

  • The Killer – Unlocking the Dark Charms of A David Fincher Masterpiece

    As we bid farewell to 2023, let’s delve into one of the most unexpected cinematic gems that slipped onto Netflix like a shadow in the night – David Fincher’s latest creation, “The Killer.”

    A Slow Burn, but Oh, What a Burn!

    Michael Fassbender, charisma personified, steps into the shoes of a Hitman on a personal vendetta. The first 30 minutes of “The Killer” are a gripping cinematic experience, an essential phase that masterfully sets the stage for what’s to come. The deliberate pacing immerses you in the character’s world, introducing you to the pros and cons of his job – a job that involves murder.

    The Michael Fassbender

     ShowFassbender, who hasn’t graced the big screen since “Dark Phoenix,” reminds us why he was the talk of the 2010s. In “The Killer,” it’s not just a lead role; it’s the Michael Fassbender show. The film is a solo journey, with Fassbender’s character encountering others briefly, making each interaction count. Tilda Swinton, in a fleeting scene, leaves her mark, proving that even the briefest encounters can be impactful.

    Into the Mind of a Cold Killer

    The film unfolds as an intimate breakdown of the protagonist’s inner monologue. It challenges viewers with a character so cold, so morally ambiguous, that it might be unsettling. “The Killer” doesn’t present a Dexter Morgan with a code; instead, it thrusts you into the mind of a high school teacher turned pathological murderer with no moral qualms.


    David Fincher’s Signature Touch

    Fincher’s directorial brilliance shines through with meticulous camera work, creating a visually stunning movie. The film is a feast for the eyes, with every frame meticulously crafted. In the realm of audio, Fincher’s creative choices, particularly in a visceral fight scene, elevate the viewing experience, immersing you in the character’s perspective.

    The Devil’s in the Details

    “The Killer” is a testament to Fincher’s mastery of details. The deliberate pacing, the nuanced character exploration, and the immersive audio-visual experience contribute to a dark joyless tale of calculated murder. The film is not an action-packed escapade but a deliberately paced, slow burn that captivates with its unexpected engagement.

    A Fizzling Conclusion?

    As the film concludes, some might feel a sense of fizzling, a sentiment echoed by a few. Yet, in a narrative where the journey often outweighs the destination, “The Killer” leaves an indelible mark. The unexpected engagement and the dark joy of witnessing Fassbender’s character unravel his vendetta make the journey worthwhile.

    In a world where physical media is becoming obsolete, “The Killer” stands out as a film deserving of a place in your collection, perhaps on a VHS tape for a touch of nostalgia. If you appreciate deliberately paced, character-driven narratives, and the charisma of Michael Fassbender, this film is a dark joy waiting to be experienced.

    So, have you witnessed the dark charms of “The Killer”? Share your thoughts, delve into your favorite David Fincher films, and let’s celebrate the enigmatic allure of this cinematic journey. Live long and prosper, movie lovers!

  • Napoleon – An Epic Tale retold by Ridley Scott

    History buffs and film enthusiasts! Buckle up! & let’s embark on a cinematic journey into the life and times of one of history’s most iconic figures – Napoleon Bonaparte. Ridley Scott, the visionary director behind this epic tale, takes us beyond the textbook narratives and into the complex world of the French leader.

    Phoenix Rising: Joaquin Phoenix as Napoleon

    Joaquin Phoenix steps into the ambitious shoes of Napoleon Bonaparte, bringing to life a character who is more than just a military tactician. Phoenix’s performance captures the essence of Napoleon’s quirks, insecurities, and the infamous Napoleon complex. He projects a flawed man, lashing out, navigating political intricacies, and revealing a side of history often overlooked.

    A French Tale with a Twist of Humor

    In a nod to historical accuracy, the film adopts a unique approach to language, foregoing French accents for a more authentic experience. Despite initial skepticism, Phoenix’s portrayal, coupled with humorous and human interactions, delivers a surprisingly funny narrative. Ridley Scott weaves humor seamlessly, making it a relatable exploration of real human interactions amidst volatile political situations.

    Vanessa Kirby’s Standout Performance

    Vanessa Kirby shines as she navigates the complexities of her character’s relationship with Napoleon. In a film dominated by Joaquin Phoenix’s presence, Kirby holds her own, showcasing her versatility and adding layers to the dynamic between the two characters. Her performance contributes to the film’s engaging and often volatile narrative.


    Battle Sequences: Raw and Riveting

    No historical epic is complete without epic battle sequences, and “Napoleon” delivers. The visceral, raw depiction of battles immerses viewers in the blood, death, and destruction of Napoleon’s military campaigns. Ridley Scott’s attention to historical accuracy, even in depicting the harsh realities faced by horses, adds authenticity to the grand scale of the film.


    Pacing Issues and the Promise of a 4-Hour Cut

    While “Napoleon” boasts a grand scale, it is not without its flaws. Pacing and time management issues contribute to a sense of dragging, making the 2-hour 40-minute runtime feel longer than it is. However, the promise of a 4-hour cut sparks curiosity, hinting at the potential to smooth out the pacing and enhance the overall flow of the narrative.

    Cinematic Immersion: For Better or Worse

    In the end, “Napoleon” offers a cinematic experience that immerses audiences in the grandeur of the era. From Phoenix’s captivating performance to the engaging battle sequences and the film’s commitment to historical accuracy, it is a journey worth undertaking. Pacing issues aside, the film still manages to provide a good time without the need for alcohol.

    Have You Marched with “Napoleon”?

    Now that we’ve explored the highs and lows of Ridley Scott’s “Napoleon,” we want to hear from you. Have you witnessed this cinematic epic? What are your thoughts on Joaquin Phoenix’s portrayal, the battle sequences, and the promise of a 4-hour cut? Share your insights and join the conversation on historical epics. Until next time, let the cinematic voyage continue! 🎬🏰

  • Steam Deck OLED review

    The SteamDeck OLED was announced. Days ago, we  have not reviewed the OG SteamDeck, but that doesn’t matter. The TL;DR is; If you can afford it, and you’re looking for a gaming handheld, the SteamDeck OLED: is a no-brainer: “you should buy this”.

    Hear us out.

    1.  For the same price of 399USD, 549USD, and 649USD (let’s ignore the special edition that’s being sold for 679USD for a second here), you get yourself a very different SteamDeck compared to the OG SteamDeck. Gone are the 64GB emmc options, and now you get a 256GB edition as the baseline model, with the 1TB model as the new high-end option. Everything has been upgraded. Even the chip (sort of, but we’ll explain a little bit down the line). It is a more mod that’s really suitable as a device released in 2023, compared to the OG SteamDeck.
    2.  Valve’s incredible software support in both OS and software optimization. Ever since Steam Deck LCD’s original announcement and release a year later, up until now (and also hopefully into the future), Valve has been on a breakneck pace of updates and optimization. Let me explain. Steam Deck OLED runs on SteamOS 3, which is based on Arch Linux. Because it is an OS that Valve updated, Valve has control over what it can and what it wants to update. Therefore, in theory and practice, Valve can now update and make changes to the OS if it can positively affect games. This is how SteamOS runs Proton to run Steam Library games. Steam Games that can be played are listed as “playable”, while games that run very well / optimized for For are listed as “SteamDeck Verified”. To quote an example, when Fromsoft released Elden Ring, some players found the game not enjoyable due to performance hits on the OG SteamDeck. While Fromsoft couldn’t address the issue immediately, Valve was able to. It is a well-documented case, and SteamDeck players enjoyed a much smoother experience (and in some cases, smoother than even god-tier gaming PCs) . This marks as the third year for SteamDeck LCD’s release, it hasn’t stopped Valve from optimizing games to run on Steam Deck. This is almost unheard of (except if you compare to consoles like the Playstation, Switch, XBOX, etc) in terms of longetivity support for an “underpowered” gaming handheld, and even games in 2023 can be played with satisfaction.
    3.  “The whole is greater than the sum of parts”. We may butcher Aristotle’s quote here, but it is what it is and is more prominent in SteamDeck OLED. We did say we’ll delve deeper into some specifics, didn’t we? Let’s do so. Go to https://www.steamdeck.com/en/oled, scroll down to “See Other updates to Steam Deck OLED”, click the “+” expand button, and then read that. If that doesn’t make sense, let us try to. In summary

    You get a bigger, more vivid, more colour-accurate, brighter, smoother (for some games) screen on the Steam Deck OLED

    You get better connectivity to your wireless devices (and now you can use devices like Bluetooth gaming headsets that support low latency), and you can upload and download faster on your Steam Deck OLED.

    Maintenance is easier because the screws are now torx screws that screw into metal, no more self-threading Phillips head screws, and much lesser screws.

    The entire innard layout is re-designed, and also a slightly beefier fan and slightly beefier battery. With APU changes, the overall unit should run cooler, and the fan noise should be lower (because it’s a better fan and there’s less heat from the new APU).

    While it is not noticeably lighter, the Steam Deck OLED is identical to the Steam Deck LCD. If you’ve bought any accessories in preparation to buy a Steam Deck, you’ll be happy knowing that they would work just as well with Steam Deck OLED (anything except innard components).

    All of the hardware upgrades also mean that now Steam Deck OLED (while it isn’t designed to be), is now a more capable computing device if you need it to do generic computing stuffs. (Some caveats still exist, but remember, Steam Deck is a gaming handheld first, computing device second).

    If you have the money, and looking for a PC gaming handheld, go get the Steam Deck OLED.

  • The Marvels Movie – Swapping Superpowers to failure!

    Alright, folks, buckle up because we’re diving into the latest Marvel Cinematic Universe adventure, and let me tell you, it’s a wild ride. If you’ve been wondering about the trio of Captain Marvel, Monica Rambo, and Miss Marvel teaming up, or if you just want the lowdown on the movie’s quirks, stick around!

    The Marvels Unleashed

    In the era of MCU phases four and five, post-Endgame, we’re introduced to a trio of powerhouse heroines—Captain Marvel, Monica Rambo, and Miss Marvel. The twist? Their powers are on a swapping spree. Imagine a game of musical chairs, but with superpowers. Initially intriguing, right?

    Miss Marvel Shines Bright

    Iman Volan, the actress behind Miss Marvel (Kamala Khan), steals the show. She brings an endearing quality to the film, embodying a fangirl’s dream come true. Her screen presence is undeniable, making her the heart of the movie. Miss Marvel proves to be a delightful surprise, even if you haven’t caught her standalone series.

    Emotional Connections and Missed Opportunities

    Now, let’s talk emotional depth. The movie attempts to delve into the connections between characters like Carol Danvers and Monica Rambo. While there are moments that hint at something heartfelt, it struggles to resonate amid the film’s shortcomings. The emotional potential seems to be there, but execution falls short.

    Budget Villain Alert

    Enter the villain, Darb Ben, a character with Dollar Store Ronan the Accuser vibes. Unfortunately, this new addition to the MCU rogues’ gallery falls flat, earning the title of “absolute worst.” The lack of depth and development makes you long for the complexity found in other MCU villains. It’s a missed opportunity that leaves us wanting more.

    CGI Galore and Action Sequences

    The CGI in the movie is a mixed bag. Action sequences, filled with CGI and power-swapping antics, sometimes leave you wondering about the mechanics. Why and when characters swap powers can be confusing, creating intermittent moments of distraction. Still, during still moments, the CGI flaws become more apparent.

    Bizarre Side Quests

    Prepare yourself for a couple of out-of-place side quests. One involves singing as the primary means of communication on a planet, reminiscent of a quirky DuckTales episode. The other involves a peculiar cat-related quest that feels forced and out of sync with the movie’s tone. These odd detours add inconsistency to the overall experience.

    The Puzzling Plot

    As for the plot, things get a bit murky. The movie’s central theme appears to be the swapping of powers, but that’s more of a mechanic than a plot. The overarching storyline revolves around stopping a villain engaged in generic “baddy things.” It lacks the depth and uniqueness needed to make it truly memorable.

    Almost…

    Despite its under-two-hour runtime, Captain Marvel leaves you questioning its purpose. A mid-credits scene adds a dash of excitement, but a post-credits scene seems less enticing. Iman Volani’s portrayal of Miss Marvel is a shining beacon in an otherwise complacent MCU installment. The film, while entertaining in moments, falls short of making a lasting impact.

    So, is Captain Marvel a must-watch? Well, if you’re a die-hard Marvel fan or intrigued by the power-swapping concept, it might be worth a spin. For others, it’s a high-budget Grade B experience that lacks the campy charm needed for future cult classic status. Here’s hoping for a rejuvenated MCU in the years to come!

    And that’s a wrap on this AI-generated Marvel adventure. Until next time, true believers!

  • PlayStation 5 Slim – The Slim Shady Redesign – What You Need to Know!

    Grab your controllers because we’ve got some exciting news from the gaming world. The much-anticipated PlayStation 5 has undergone a makeover, and we’re here to spill the deets. So, let’s dive into the world of the new PlayStation Slim, the latest addition to the gaming console family.

    A Quick Dash to the Store

    Picture this: A bunch of gaming hardware dropping simultaneously. What did we do? We hit the store and snagged the revamped PlayStation 5. Now, you might have heard people calling it the PlayStation Slim, but in reality, it’s more of a PlayStation revision. This version comes with a disc drive and is currently available in a bundle with “Modern Warfare III” or “Spider-Man 2” for $500 in the US. Sony’s plan? This is the future of PlayStation 5, gradually phasing out the older version.

    To Slim or Not to Slim?

    Now, the burning question – do you need to rush out and grab this sleek new console? Well, if you’ve been patiently waiting for a PlayStation 5, and the Slim is on your radar, stick around for some key insights. It’s been three years since the PS5 launch, and if you recall our iconic video featuring the PS5 on a DeLorean, you know it’s been a wild ride.

    Size Matters? Slimmer, Sleeker, Sharper

    Let’s get real about the design. Yes, it’s smaller, but opinions are divided. Some say it’s not shrunk down enough, while others appreciate the subtle reduction in size. Our take? It’s a step in the right direction. Check out our side-by-side comparisons to see the difference. While it’s still a sizable console, the reduction in size is a welcome change, especially for those who found the original PS5 a bit too bulky.

    Under the Hood: Notable Improvements

    Now, let’s talk improvements. While the internals have seen tweaks for the downsizing magic, two notable enhancements stand out. First, the Slim version now ships with a one-terabyte storage, a slight upgrade from the original base PS5. It might not be a game-changer, but every bit of extra storage helps in the gaming world. Additionally, the front now features two USB ports, making connectivity a breeze.

    Idiot-Proof Design? We Approve!

    One impressive aspect of the Slim is its user-friendly design. If you’re the type to tinker with your gaming console, this one’s for you. Popping off the panels is a breeze, and the modularity allows for easy customization. The PS5 Slim is shockingly idiot-proof, with panels that pop off smoothly, ensuring you won’t break any plastic tabs during your DIY adventures.

    Disc Drive Drama: It’s Detachable!

    Let’s talk disc drives. The Slim introduces a detachable disc drive, aligning with Sony’s plan to offer an all-digital version. If you opt for the digital experience but later crave the whirring of a disc drive, fear not – you can purchase it separately for $80 in the US. Removing the disc drive is a joy in itself – a fun and hassle-free process.

    Legs and Stands: Clear Plastic Wonders

    Now, let’s address the elephant in the room – the legs and stands. The PlayStation 5 is now supported by clear plastic legs that you pop into the bottom. While they do the job and offer a clear view of what’s holding up your console, they may not match the elegance of the original floating design. But hey, different strokes for different folks.

    The Future of PlayStation Gaming

    Wondering about the state of PlayStation gaming in 2023? Well, the past three years have seen a fantastic lineup of games. From “Horizon Forbidden West” to “Spider-Man 2” and “Returnal,” there’s a treasure trove waiting for gamers. As for future gaming experiences, we’re keeping an eye on Sony’s plans. Reports suggest a shift toward live service games, but the landscape is ever-changing. We’re eager to see Sony’s next big roster of blockbusters and how they’ll shape the gaming future.

    Is It Slim Pickings or a Gaming Feast?

    In conclusion, the PlayStation 5 Slim is more of a revision than a revolution. The design tweaks, storage upgrade, and modularity make it a noteworthy addition for gaming enthusiasts. If you’re diving into the PlayStation world in 2023, there’s an array of exciting games awaiting your command. Whether you opt for the original or the Slim, happy gaming!

    That’s a wrap for our hands-on experience with the PlayStation 5 Slim. If you’ve already laid your hands on this sleek console, share your thoughts in the comments. Are you Team PlayStation? Excited about the future of Sony gaming? Let the gaming banter begin! And don’t forget to hit that like button if you enjoyed this rundown. Game on! 🎮

  • Modern Warfare 3 Campaign – A Short, Sweet, or Just Plain Sour Experience?

    Greetings, fellow gamers! Today, let’s dive into the adrenaline-pumping world of “Modern Warfare 3.” Now, we might be a bit fashionably late to the party, but better late than never, right? Today, our focus is solely on the campaign, because, well, campaigns are our jam. Buckle up, because this one’s a bit of a rollercoaster.

    Late to the Party, Early to the Campaign

    So, hot off the heels of “Modern Warfare 2,” we find ourselves in the action-packed universe of “Modern Warfare 3.” Now, we’re usually the campaign enthusiasts, and we’ve played through every “Call of Duty” campaign out there – the good, the bad, and the explosively entertaining. Why? Because who doesn’t love a bombastic adventure?

    Low on Length, Light on Excitement

    Now, let’s cut to the chase. “Modern Warfare 3” is, well, short. Not the sweet kind of short, unfortunately. It’s the kind of short that leaves you wanting more, and not in a good way. The campaign lacks the excitement we’ve come to expect from the “Call of Duty” series. Sure, there are a few moments that make you sit up, but they feel like they’re desperately trying to stand out in an otherwise lackluster experience.

    Plotting World Domination, Call of Duty Style

    Now, onto the story. The gang’s all here – Ghost, Price, Gaz, Soap, Laswell, Farah – assembled to tackle the big bad villain, Vladimir Makarov. He’s up to no good, threatening the world, launching bombs, causing chaos – your typical villainous agenda. But here’s the twist: despite the world-threatening stakes, the overall presentation feels strangely low-key. It lacks the punch we enjoyed in the previous campaigns, especially the first one.

    Short, Brief, and Not-so-Sweet

    Let’s tackle the 800-pound gorilla in the room – the campaign’s length. Brace yourself, it might only take you about four hours on a normal or hard playthrough. Now, if you’re a multiplayer aficionado, you might be thinking, “Who cares about the campaign?” But even if you’re all about that multiplayer life, the campaign still needs to deliver. And that’s where “Modern Warfare 3” falls short.

    It’s not just about being short; it’s about being short and not very good. Some missions feel like they’re not even missions, lacking the carefully planned encounters and interesting level design we crave. Instead, they feel like glorified bits of “Warzone,” the multiplayer mode. Yes, you heard it right – some missions are essentially mini “Warzone” experiences.

    Warzone Vibes in Campaign? Not Quite Right

    Now, let’s talk about these so-called open combat zones. They’re chaotic, sure, but they lack the thrill of a well-thought-out mission. It’s like playing “Warzone,” but not quite as satisfying. The enemy AI and encounters don’t match up to the standard set by the main missions. Enemies just run around, and it all feels a bit bland. You miss out on the interesting levels and engaging shootouts that make a classic “Call of Duty” mission memorable.

    Glimmers of Brilliance in a Sea of Meh

    Amidst the disappointment, there are still glimmers of brilliance. Price, the standout character, continues to be badass. There are a couple of cool moments, like a harrowing chemical attack sequence where you’re fighting your way through an office building as gas seeps in. It’s brief but genuinely intense.

    The campaign also takes a bold step by revisiting a controversial theme from the past – a new spin on the infamous “No Russian” mission. It might not generate as much buzz, but it’s genuinely terrifying and unsettling, accomplishing what it set out to do.

    The Bitter Aftertaste

    In the grand scheme of things, “Modern Warfare 3” feels like it was made out of obligation. It’s a placeholder to keep the brand going, a checkbox in the grand “Call of Duty” checklist. Playing it leaves you with the feeling that the team didn’t have enough time or budget to create a compelling adventure. It’s like a side project that got in the way of the real stars – zombies and the next big “Warzone” thing.

    Now, before we wrap this up, we get it – maybe we’re not the primary audience for this package. But “Call of Duty” campaigns used to be a staple of gaming adventures, and it’s disheartening to see them taking a back seat. Maybe we’re showing our age, but we miss those captivating single-player experiences.

    “Modern Warfare 3” might provide a few hours of moderate entertainment, but it falls short of the “Call of Duty” campaign legacy. It feels like a compromise, a game made to check a box rather than deliver a memorable experience. Whether you’re a die-hard fan or a casual player, it’s hard not to feel a tinge of disappointment.

  • Alan Wake 2 – A Thrilling Return to the Creepiest Universe

    Alan Wake fans, rejoice! The long-awaited sequel is finally here. If you’re a fan of single-player adventures, survival horror, or just enjoy Remedy’s previous games like “Control,” “Max Payne,” or the original “Alan Wake,” you’re in for a treat. Today, we’re diving into the eerie world of “Alan Wake 2.”

    Worth the Wait

    Let’s not beat around the bush – this game is worth the years of anticipation. Remedy has crafted an uncompromising and thrilling experience that doesn’t hold your hand. It’s a rollercoaster of emotions, featuring scary, quirky, and challenging moments.

    The Setting

    “Alan Wake 2” is a spiritual successor to the original game from 2010. It combines elements from “Control” and Remedy’s cinematic universe. You’ll step into the shoes of two characters, Saga Anderson, an FBI agent investigating mysterious murders in Bright Falls, and Alan Wake, the missing author, lost in a nightmarish version of New York.

    Survival Horror

    Unlike the first “Alan Wake,” this sequel leans more toward survival horror. Picture the original’s flashlight and gun gameplay mixed with the feel of “Resident Evil 2,” “3,” and “4” remakes, with satisfying combat. The key here is resource management since you’ll often find yourself low on ammo and health. The enemies are unpredictable and designed to keep you on edge.

    Solving the Mystery

    Apart from surviving, the game is all about exploration and puzzle-solving. Saga’s part of the game focuses on detective work. You’ll collect clues, talk to people, and, in a unique twist, enter her mind to piece together the mystery in a cozy log cabin. It’s detective work without the overly complex deductions.

    Alan’s Writer’s Room

    Alan’s part of the game centers around rewriting scenes. You’ll change scenes in real time, moving doors, altering environments, and uncovering new paths. It’s challenging and spectacular, offering a unique gaming experience.

    Newcomer-Friendly

    If you haven’t played the first “Alan Wake,” don’t worry; this sequel does a decent job of onboarding new players. While watching a recap video might enhance your understanding, the game’s unique atmosphere and storytelling will captivate you, even without previous knowledge.

    Visual Brilliance

    The game excels in terms of visuals, with immersive environments that include eerie woods, small-town streets, and nightmarish hallways. The game offers a good balance of horror and tension, making it scarier than the original but not nightmare-inducing.

    A Few Cons

    While “Alan Wake 2” is fantastic, it’s not without a few downsides. There are occasional glitches and visual bugs, but these are being addressed in a day-one patch. Also, keep in mind that there is no physical version of the game, which could be a drawback for collectors.

    If you’re a fan of Remedy’s games or enjoy a mix of adventure, action, weird mysteries, and survival horror, “Alan Wake 2” is a must-play. With over 20 hours of gameplay and a new Game+ mode coming soon, it offers an engaging experience that will leave you craving more. This is a testament to Remedy’s game design prowess, and it might just be their best game to date.

    So, whether you’re new to the franchise or a die-hard fan, “Alan Wake 2” is an unforgettable journey worth embarking on. Are you excited to dive into the enigmatic world of Bright Falls? Share your thoughts in the comments and let’s discuss all things “Alan Wake.” Happy gaming!

  • Five Nights at Freddy’s Movie Review – Missed Jump Scares and Opportunities

    Hey there, fellow movie buffs and Five Nights at Freddy’s enthusiasts! So, you’ve heard the big news – the Five Nights at Freddy’s movie has made its way to the big screen and is now available on Peacock. A big-screen adaptation of this iconic game, what could possibly go wrong? Well, let’s dive right in and explore the intriguing journey of this adaptation.

    Confession Time

    Before we unravel this tale, let’s get something out of the way – I’ve never played Five Nights at Freddy’s. But fret not, I’m well aware of its gameplay mechanics, the spooky animatronic characters, and its immense popularity. So, even though I haven’t played it, I can still navigate through this dark, animatronic-filled world.

    The Plot Unleashed

    The movie introduces us to a character named Mike, played by Josh Hutcherson. He’s dealing with a family legal battle for custody of his younger sister while carrying the weight of guilt from a childhood kidnapping incident. To top it all off, he lands a night shift security job at Freddy Fazbear’s – a condemned Chuck-E-Cheese-like family fun center teeming with possessed killer animatronic creatures.

    A Glimpse of Awesomeness

    Let’s start with the good stuff – there’s a scene in the movie (bear in mind, the film is PG-13) where people break into Freddy Fazbear’s during the daytime. These animatronics deal with the intruders in an unexpectedly awesome way, resulting in a scene you won’t forget anytime soon. This moment is a standout and would have been a great addition to an R-rated film. Speaking of which, this movie could have benefited from an R-rating and a dose of gore. It’s Five Nights at Freddy’s, after all!

    A Night That Feels Like Five Days

    Five Nights at Freddy’s, as a game, is designed around a one-night premise. However, when translating this into a cinematic experience, the concept becomes tricky. The movie drags on for an hour and 40 minutes, with stretches of dull character development that feels inconsequential. It could have been more concise, possibly a solid 15-minute fan film.

    Mismatched and Odd Moments

    During its runtime, the film throws at us an array of weird sequences and unnecessary characters. There are dream sequences that feel out of place, making you wonder if they belong in a Five Nights at Freddy’s movie.


    Can We Talk Like Normal People?

    A strange feeling permeates the movie, as the characters’ dialogue often sounds more appropriate for a satirical horror film rather than a thriller. Matthew Lillard, in his limited screen time, does provide some comic relief, but the overall vibe is far from what you’d expect in a horror flick.

    A Missed Opportunity

    In the end, the movie feels like an absurdly predictable mix of family drama, child trauma, occasional slasher moments, and sporadic kind animatronic scenes. It’s a disappointing experience that lacks cohesion. As a horror movie, it fails to induce fear or chills.

    Lackluster and Unfulfilling

    Regrettably, the movie doesn’t do justice to the lore of Five Nights at Freddy’s. Many fans were excited about the adaptation but have been left with a subpar film. It fails to live up to the anticipation and delivers a snooze-fest that you can predict from a mile away.

    Not a Game-Changer

    For fans of the game, this adaptation might hold a few Easter eggs and references, but when viewed as a stand-alone movie, it’s disappointingly generic. The film ends up falling into the trap of many video game adaptations – it simply doesn’t live up to its source material.

    So, there you have it. The Five Nights at Freddy’s movie, a rollercoaster of hope and disappointment. But isn’t that a common tale when Hollywood adapts a beloved video game? Let’s hope the next adaptation can break the curse.